<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Base is coming</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.surfulater.com/2005/10/26/google-base/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.surfulater.com/2005/10/26/google-base/</link>
	<description>Surfulater, the journey continues...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:22:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: nevf</title>
		<link>http://blog.surfulater.com/2005/10/26/google-base/#comment-455</link>
		<dc:creator>nevf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 14:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.surfulater.com/wordpress/?p=37#comment-455</guid>
		<description>Juan, 
I agree with you 110%. See my earlier Google gripe at: http://blog.surfulater.com/wordpress/?p=20

Another search engine could come along tommorrow that worked better than Google and folks would switch in droves, just like they did when they moved to Google in the first place. It is very hard for something that is free to have brand loyalty. This is probably part of the reason why Google is putting its finger in so many different pies.

There are no signs that Google is working on the issues you&#039;ve raised and if anything things are simply getting worse. 

I&#039;m hearing more and more lately about people stopping their Google Ads. My guess is that there are enough new advertisers coming along all the time that this isn&#039;t yet a problem for Google. It can&#039;t last forever though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Juan,<br />
I agree with you 110%. See my earlier Google gripe at: <a href="http://blog.surfulater.com/wordpress/?p=20" rel="nofollow">http://blog.surfulater.com/wordpress/?p=20</a></p>
<p>Another search engine could come along tommorrow that worked better than Google and folks would switch in droves, just like they did when they moved to Google in the first place. It is very hard for something that is free to have brand loyalty. This is probably part of the reason why Google is putting its finger in so many different pies.</p>
<p>There are no signs that Google is working on the issues you&#8217;ve raised and if anything things are simply getting worse. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m hearing more and more lately about people stopping their Google Ads. My guess is that there are enough new advertisers coming along all the time that this isn&#8217;t yet a problem for Google. It can&#8217;t last forever though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juan Lopez-Valcarcel</title>
		<link>http://blog.surfulater.com/2005/10/26/google-base/#comment-454</link>
		<dc:creator>Juan Lopez-Valcarcel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 13:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.surfulater.com/wordpress/?p=37#comment-454</guid>
		<description>Instead of launching half-baked features every day, Google should first focus on resolving the key issues in its core search business:
- fake sites that distort the search rankings for users
- fake click-throughs that make advertisers lose confidence on Googleâ€™s advertising

â€¦ any other features beyond good solid search are just a â€œnice to haveâ€ </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Instead of launching half-baked features every day, Google should first focus on resolving the key issues in its core search business:<br />
- fake sites that distort the search rankings for users<br />
- fake click-throughs that make advertisers lose confidence on Googleâ€™s advertising</p>
<p>â€¦ any other features beyond good solid search are just a â€œnice to haveâ€</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

